Unity without Uniformity: A Comparative Study of the Great Mosque of Xi’an and the Tabačka Mosque in Visoko
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65262/ftdm4t18Keywords:
critical religionalism, comparative study, mosque architecture, the Great Mosque of Xi’an, the Tabačka MosqueAbstract
This article presents a comparative architectural and urban analysis of mosque traditions in China and Bosnia and Herzegovina. It argues that mosques in these two regions should not be interpreted as peripheral or simplified variations of a presumed Middle Eastern archetype, but as historically grounded Islamic spatial traditions shaped by regional adaptation, socio-political negotiation, and material translation. The paper shifts the discussion from a form-based definition of the mosque to a focus on ritual and spatial understandings of mosque architecture. Using selected case studies—the Huajue Lane Great Mosque in Xi’an and the Tabačka Mosque in Visoko—the article examines dimensions of construction, material systems, spatial sequences, orientation strategies, and urban embedding. Drawing on the principles of critical regionalism, the analysis demonstrates that Chinese and Bosnian mosques each reconfigure Islamic religious space through distinctive local traditions, including timber or masonry construction cultures, climate adaptations, and institutional histories. By bridging two contexts, the paper contributes to a decentralized historiography of Islamic architecture and advocates a broader framework for conceptualizing the mosque as a plural, regionally produced, and historically evolving architectural form.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Acta Architectonica et Urbanistica

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Acta Architectonica et Urbanistica (AAeU) journal is open access, it means that any researcher from any institution, anywhere in the world is able to access the full extent of AAeU publications with no subscription fees. This means that policy-makers, NGOs, journalists, practitioners, students, and an interested public have free access to the research articles. This increases the exposure and allows to disseminate knowledge to a much wider audience.




